20 Reasons Why Hinduism Is Very Scientific Religion
Traditions in Hinduism were considered mainly as superstitions, but with the advent of science, it is becoming evident that these traditions are based on some . There is no need for any blind belief to qualify for heaven. There are many other proofs of Hinduism, that is a great science wherein we get all the Knowledge of times, most of the currency used were made of copper unlike the stainless steel coins of today. . relationship between Hinduism, Sanatana Dharma and Yoga. hinduism and science - Scientific Reasons Behind Indian Traditions - Traditions currency used was made of copper unlike the stainless steel coins of today. Hindu religion has bestowed 'Tulsi', with the status of mother. .. Beware: These 5 zodiac signs will not give you any 'Space' in your relationship.
MillerKatharine HayhoeGeorge Coyne and Simon Conway Morris argue for compatibility since they do not agree that science is incompatible with religion and vice versa. They argue that science provides many opportunities to look for and find God in nature and to reflect on their beliefs. What he finds particularly odd and unjustified is in how atheists often come to invoke scientific authority on their non-scientific philosophical conclusions like there being no point or no meaning to the universe as the only viable option when the scientific method and science never have had any way of addressing questions of meaning or God in the first place.
Furthermore, he notes that since evolution made the brain and since the brain can handle both religion and science, there is no natural incompatibility between the concepts at the biological level. He argues that leaders in science sometimes trump older scientific baggage and that leaders in theology do the same, so once theological intellectuals are taken into account, people who represent extreme positions like Ken Ham and Eugenie Scott will become irrelevant.
Conflict thesis The conflict thesiswhich holds that religion and science have been in conflict continuously throughout history, was popularized in the 19th century by John William Draper 's and Andrew Dickson White 's accounts. It was in the 19th century that relationship between science and religion became an actual formal topic of discourse, while before this no one had pitted science against religion or vice versa, though occasional complex interactions had been expressed before the 19th century.
If Galileo and the Scopes trial come to mind as examples of conflict, they were the exceptions rather than the rule. By Galileo went to Rome to try to persuade Catholic Church authorities not to ban Copernicus' ideas. In the end, a decree of the Congregation of the Index was issued, declaring that the ideas that the Sun stood still and that the Earth moved were "false" and "altogether contrary to Holy Scripture", and suspending Copernicus's De Revolutionibus until it could be corrected.
Galileo was found "vehemently suspect of heresy", namely of having held the opinions that the Sun lies motionless at the center of the universe, that the Earth is not at its centre and moves. He was required to "abjure, curse and detest" those opinions. The Church had merely sided with the scientific consensus of the time. Only the latter was fulfilled by Galileo. Although the preface of his book claims that the character is named after a famous Aristotelian philosopher Simplicius in Latin, Simplicio in Italianthe name "Simplicio" in Italian also has the connotation of "simpleton".
Most historians agree Galileo did not act out of malice and felt blindsided by the reaction to his book. Galileo had alienated one of his biggest and most powerful supporters, the Pope, and was called to Rome to defend his writings.
Graylingstill believes there is competition between science and religions and point to the origin of the universe, the nature of human beings and the possibility of miracles  Independence[ edit ] A modern view, described by Stephen Jay Gould as " non-overlapping magisteria " NOMAis that science and religion deal with fundamentally separate aspects of human experience and so, when each stays within its own domain, they co-exist peacefully.
Stace viewed independence from the perspective of the philosophy of religion. Stace felt that science and religion, when each is viewed in its own domain, are both consistent and complete. In science, explanations must be based on evidence drawn from examining the natural world. Scientifically based observations or experiments that conflict with an explanation eventually must lead to modification or even abandonment of that explanation. Religious faith, in contrast, does not depend on empirical evidence, is not necessarily modified in the face of conflicting evidence, and typically involves supernatural forces or entities.
Because they are not a part of nature, supernatural entities cannot be investigated by science. In this sense, science and religion are separate and address aspects of human understanding in different ways.
Attempts to put science and religion against each other create controversy where none needs to exist. He views science as descriptive and religion as prescriptive. He stated that if science and mathematics concentrate on what the world ought to be, in the way that religion does, it may lead to improperly ascribing properties to the natural world as happened among the followers of Pythagoras in the sixth century B. Habgood also stated that he believed that the reverse situation, where religion attempts to be descriptive, can also lead to inappropriately assigning properties to the natural world.
A notable example is the now defunct belief in the Ptolemaic geocentric planetary model that held sway until changes in scientific and religious thinking were brought about by Galileo and proponents of his views. Kuhn asserted that science is made up of paradigms that arise from cultural traditions, which is similar to the secular perspective on religion.
Hinduism: Where Science and Spirituality Intersect | HuffPost
Polanyi further asserted that all knowledge is personal and therefore the scientist must be performing a very personal if not necessarily subjective role when doing science. Coulson and Harold K. Schillingboth claimed that "the methods of science and religion have much in common. Dialogue[ edit ] Clerks studying astronomy and geometry France, early 15th century.
The religion and science community consists of those scholars who involve themselves with what has been called the "religion-and-science dialogue" or the "religion-and-science field. That cause problems related to blood pressure and our heart needs to work harder in order to overcome this asymmetry of Magnetic fields. Apart from this, another reason is that Our body have the significant amount of iron in our blood. When we sleep in this position, iron from the whole body starts to congregate in the brain.
Many physicians and philosophers believe that piercing the ears helps in the development of intellect, a power of thinking and decision-making faculties. Talkativeness fritters away life energy.
Religion and Science
Ear piercing helps in speech-restraint. It helps to reduce impertinent behavior and the ear channels become free from disorders. So, the Tulsi leaves are mainly used for treating fever, common cold, cough, sore throat, and respiratory disorders. Therefore, I think not only Hindus but all of us should have a Tulsi plant in front of our house.
Religion and Science (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Why Hindus worship some particular trees and not all the trees? It is true that Hindus honor all the trees but some particular trees and plants are considered sacred and have been worshiped over thousands of years. These two trees are hour oxygen generators and cannot be planted manually. They grow on their own mainly through the birds, which eat their fruits. Audumbar tree is associated with Guru Dattatreya, one of the main Hindu deities and cutting or dishonoring the tree in any way is considered as a sin.
- Hinduism: Where Science and Spirituality Intersect
- Relationship between religion and science
- 20 Reasons Why Hinduism Is Very Scientific Religion
Both of these trees are very important for ecological balance. So by associating them with Hindu deities, they have been protected, so that no one would cut them. Why Hindus pierce ears of a baby? Actually, it is a part of acupuncture treatment. Acupuncture and acupressure are not new to Hindus. Even it is said that these techniques originated in India and later they were conserved and modified by the Chinese.
The outer part of ears carries a lot of important acupuncture and acupressure points.
The point where the ears of a baby are pierced is known for curing asthma. That is why even ancient Hindus used to wear earrings but nowadays most Hindus do not wear earrings. They do not even pierce the ears after first piercing. The holes in their ears become invisible after as they grow up.
Only Hindu female wear earrings as a tradition. But there are males of some castes in Hinduism who wear earrings as a tradition till now. Why Hindus do not eat meat on particular days? Hindus do not eat meat on particular days, not limited but including: Amongst these, the reason for not eating meat on some particular days excluding weekly days is purely religious.
Killing of animals is considered as a sin in Hinduism. So, people avoid eating meat at least on those auspicious days to maintain the sacredness of that particular day. The reason behind not eating meat on weekdays including Mondays, Thursdays, and Saturdays is that as a human being we need only a little amount of meat to fulfill requirements of our body such as iron, vitamin B12 and other vital nutrients.
But human being basically is an animal and we get addicted to eating meat. As we all know eating excessive meat is not good for health.