Relationship between post structuralism and colonialism theory

relationship between post structuralism and colonialism theory

Jameson's theory of third world literature as "national allegory," should, if noth . convergence of postcolonialism and poststructuralism is ne see it as the starting. answered a question related to Structuralism and Post-Structuralism. How does What are the possible relations between Post-colonialism and queer theory?. 45 13 atic critique of Western metaphysics of being and Poststructuralism 18 and patriarchal social relations to unveil the hid- tinely accused of being apolitical . In her groundbreak- Education and Postcolonial Theory ing article.

While disciplines form the individualizing moment in the exercise of power, biopower is totalizing in that it takes as its object the mass of coexisting beings.

Comparison Post-Colonialism and Post-Structuralism Essay

The emergence of biopower constitutes a shift in the mechanisms of sovereign power. They challenge disciplinary boundaries by taking to task the discursive limits of the discipline constructed in the language of modern social sciences, which presumes a unity between natural and social sciences and the possibility to distinguish between facts and values Smith,p.

They deny a strict separation between the subject who knows from the object that is known and problematizes the assumption that there can be a universal scientific language that allows the external world to be described in a detached manner Campbell, International Relations theory is regarded as a specific, privileged site that contributes to the production and reproduction of dominant interpretations of the world, hence, as constitutive of particular understandings of global life in terms of the binary logic of sovereignty and anarchy, inside and outside at the expense of others.

In his seminal work, for instance, R. Walkerp. Any mode of thought.

In his deconstructive reading of—what he terms as—the paradigm of sovereignty, Ashley elaborates on how these three phenomena fuse into each other for both historical and epistemological reasons in modernity. Situated within the broader discursive and political agenda of modernity, sovereignty becomes the nodal point where reasoning, autonomous Man, who is invested with the capacity and the will to emancipate humankind, fuses with the sovereign political community the modern state as the locus of political life.

This narrative proscribes a political life amid an anarchical world of Otherness where the discourses of danger work toward domesticating political life by policing the limits, the boundaries of identity, of political possibility and ethical responsibility as it demarcates the self, secure inside, from the other, the dangerous outside Ashley, ; Walker, They deny the state functional unity or priority over other relations of power Kalyvas, Put differently, rather than treating the state as an a priori, ontological given, they investigate how the sovereign state is produced as a cohesive, purposive actor through the ongoing dynamic processes of statecraft.

Poststructuralism and Postmodernism in International Relations

They explore the ways in which the enactment of various domestic and foreign policies produce particular understandings of the state and constitutes the identity of the self. Always a work in progress and never a finished product, the state is thus constituted through practices that code and discipline boundaries and produce identity.

While the relation between identity and foreign policy constitutes an important area of investigation, there is no uniform understanding of the representation of difference, of the other, the outside in the constitution of the self, the identity, the inside. For instance, for scholars like Campbell, discourses of danger are central to securing state identity and legitimizing state power.

Shifting the focus away from geopolitical forms of othering between the inside and the outside, yet others focus on the temporal forms of othering in the constitution of the self Diez, Making central the idea that violence is constitutive of modern subjectivity and modern political freedom is a lethal affair Dillon,they examine strategic and security discourses to expose the ways in which the modern state constitutes political life as militarized life Campbell, ; Chaloupka, ; Klein, Informing these analyses is the idea that politics in modernity derives from an ontology of violence occasioned by a certain understanding of political subjectivity.

On the one hand, taking violence as the ultimo ratio of politics, the basic subject of modern political thought is posited as the subject of violence. On the other hand, the subject of modern politics—the autonomous reasoning subject—is a violent political subject whose features, according to modern political thought, bring him into conflict with other men. Given that the political subject of violence is a reasoning subject, the complicity of reason in the violence of the political subject cannot be elided.

What this diagnosis implies is that modern political reason not only cannot provide adequate tools to understand and address political violence, but that as a rationality of rule it is not immune to it.

relationship between post structuralism and colonialism theory

Rather than being an objective condition to be addressed and remedied through state action in order to safeguard its subjects, security is revealed as a form of political subjection, as a political technology of rule. In her analysis of food crisis and the problem of hunger, Jenny Edkins elaborates the ways in politics in modernity devoted to securing life is tantamount to the technologization and hence de-politicization of politics Edkins, Her analysis reveals the ways in which the framing of famine through discourses of modernity de-politicizes hunger and how it should be combated by prioritizing technical solutions through abstract analysis and the formulation of general principles.

Such an approach merely reinstates and reproduces the form of politics that has produced the famine in the first place. Drawing on Paul Virilio, for instance, James Der Derian places new technologies of simulation, surveillance, and speed at the center of his analysis and investigates the way in which these new forces and the discursive practices surrounding them transform the nature of international relation and it central practice—war.

According to Der Derian, new technological practices give way to novel forms of mediation between states through the discursive power of chronopolitics and technostrategy.

In this paragraph I will highlight and explain some differences between post-colonialism and post-structuralism. First of all, post-structuralists focus on language.

Jacques Rancière: Poststructuralism, postcolonialism, postmodernism

They see language as essential to how we make sense of the world Baylis,p. In relation to this focus on language there are four concepts that have been influential: According to Baylis, It highlights the international relations of colonial actions in the Third world and the continuities of that past and present Baylis,p.

Another difference between these approaches is the focus of post-structuralism on high politics and the focus of post-colonialism on low politics. To conclude, post-structuralism and post-colonialism are closely related post-positivist theories that became a part of international relations in the late decades of the 20th century. Although the two approaches seem similar, they do differ in terms of their focuses. It also encourages the use of poetry, diaries and testimonials as sources of valuable information.

The focus of post-structuralism is more on language and the four concepts that have been influential: Another difference is focus on high and low politics. Colonial legacies of vio- Spivak has theorized education as lence and antagonism can be directly indicted in pharmacon, as both a medicine and poison that the contemporary production of postcolonial ten- enable and injure subject formation by particular sions arising between French citizens, French- means, for colonizing and liberating ends.

relationship between post structuralism and colonialism theory

Excavating 4 Poststructuralism, Postcolonialism, and Education historical and political context to the legacies of pasts for perpetuating material, linguistic, and colonialism framing new social and political for- social inequities in the classroom. They view the constructing and roots.

relationship between post structuralism and colonialism theory

They share the poststructural con- nial logics inform categories of difference, norma- cern with and interrogation of the status of human tive models of human development, and ideas of in education through postcolonial inquiries that national citizenship in public schools across the persistently question the tight Western, ontologi- globe.

Through the provision of English and cal hold and normative value of the human in the French and the centering of Euro-colonial curric- formation of children through schooling. Postcolonial theory empire in the contemporary practice of education. Under global capitalism, ex-colonial school experiences.

Comparison Post-Colonialism and Post-Structuralism Essay Example for Free

As with poststructural nations continue to cling to colonial educational scholars, postcolonial scholars are concerned systems to gain economic, political, and material with the status of subjectivity and the human in advancement on the world stage.

As human the organization of categories of difference- rights-based movements of education are tied to stratifying school. The global partisan, and thus distorted versions of how each acceptance of Western forms of universal access child grows, learns, and participates in social life.

relationship between post structuralism and colonialism theory

Indeed, as and exalted conceptions of the child, language, Fazal Rizvi suggests, education in a global care, knowledge, experience, pedagogy, human age necessitates a postcolonial approach as from participation, and education. Global movements of At its most radical, postcolonial theory makes people, knowledge, and ideas generate new forms an ethical and pedagogical commitment to creat- of social connectivity, organization, and belong- ing a freedom seeking and just education for new- ing informed and driven by a postcolonial past.

Without a postcolonial violently subject. Vanessa Andreotti further argues whole existence, participation, and potential in that, as an actionable form of social praxis, particular and shared worlds. Postcolonial scholars in education argue that Western theories of develop- Ahluwalia, P. Actionable postcolonial theory in Orientalism and the postcolonial predicament: Per- education. The location of culture.

relationship between post structuralism and colonialism theory