MC-GiV2V: Multichannel Allocation in mmWave-Based Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks
A group has moved its meeting location while maintaining its mission to help Veteran to Veteran, or V2V, had been meeting monthly on Moody Air Force . Farewell, Soldiers: National Guard members heading overseas. Nexar uses a V2V network that features real-time warning “Nexar is creating the first vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) network, Jordanian King Abdullah and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas meeting in Amman on December 18 A graduation ceremony for Israeli soldiers who completed the IAF. Notes. The title card displays "COPYRIGHT LOLOLOL" on the bottom right corner , a recurring joke throughout the Meet the Team videos.
For dissemination of safety messages over roads, V2X communications e. At the end, auto companies recently release solutions based on the IEEE However, a future smart car capable of autonomous driving demands much higher data rate and low latency for vehicle control technology, which relies on large amount of data from near or medium range radars and camera sensors of neighboring vehicles. In particular, higher resolution visual data like Ultra High Definition UHD video can enable precise vehicle control; for example, if using 2 M pixel camera instead of 0.
Research on the GiV2V has not been conducted popularly and not matured yet to the best of our knowledge.
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
The GiV2V can improve network throughput because of spatial frequency reuse by directional antennas that are typically used to compensate high path loss of the mmWave. However, the spatial division may not occur constructively since vehicles are mostly aligned along lanes of roads and form a grid topology where mmWave beams are also aligned and cause mutual interference. Directivity of the directional antenna increases not only the antenna gain and signal to noise ratio SNRbut also interferences to other nodes.
Here we introduce several multichannel allocation algorithms with many available channels in the mmWave spectrum; for example, IEEE Our proposed algorithms are distributed, centralized greedy and hybrid algorithms. The distributed algorithm searches a local optimal allocation within an interference region and the greedy algorithm assigns channels based on global information i. The hybrid approach is a mixed algorithm of the above two algorithms. Details of algorithms are explained in Section 6.
According to simulation results in Section 7the hybrid approach shows best throughput among them since it probably searches a globally optimal allocation with well-distributed initial conditions. Furthermore, three well-known metaheuristic algorithms are investigated for comparison study with our proposed algorithms. Related Works Directional antenna was exhaustively exploited for a MAC protocol in multihop ad hoc networks. Most of those researches assume 2.
But the circular transmissions suffer from control overhead and excessive delay according to number of sectors. Recently, mmWave communications emerge as one of the key 5G technologies. Its feasibility has been explored by many universities and companies.
The mmWave links are considered not only for access links of mobile devices, but also for backhaul links that can constitute wireless mesh networks [ 2122 ].
In [ 23 ], demanded rate-based coordination of the directional or omnidirectional transmissions is proposed with allocation of time slots for spatial and time reuse of frequency in mmWave WLANs.
They develop a diffraction model to estimate link connectivity and decide multihop relays. From simulation, it is proved that proposed approach improves network throughput with low overhead rather than an AP-based single hop communication.
Reference [ 25 ] describes tactical scenarios using mmWave links for a secure channel in military ad hoc networks and relay operation in NLOS environment. Authors establish a 2D-PPP model of nodes and obstacles deployment and evaluate performance of one- or two-way communications in terms of SINR and coverage with simulation.
In [ 30 ], Park et al.
Reference [ 31 ] proposes a stochastic model of vehicular communications at highway for mmWave communications, where mmWave-based road side units are deployed for infrastructure to vehicle communications with high data rate rather than vehicle-to-vehicle communications.
Blockage probability according to vehicle density and speed is shown from the model. In [ 32 ], authors show design and implementation of a long-range and broadband aerial communication system with directional antennas ACDAwhich enables unmanned aerial vehicle UAV to extend communication range, increase throughput, and reduce interference.
Reference [ 33 ] proposes joint optimization to select relay and link to get around obstacle and reduce delivery latency in 60 GHz mmWave networks and develops a less complex algorithm by decomposing the problem into subproblems.
HAVstories — HAVStory
In [ 34 ], research results on propagation characteristics for V2V channels, particularly shadowing effects induced by obstructing vehicles between transmitter Tx and receiver Rxare introduced. In [ 35 ], measurement campaign is conducted in the mmWave band for the 12 most common railway materials; influence of typical objects to the mmWave propagation channel is analyzed for railway scenarios with various configurations.
Reference [ 36 ] proposes an IEEE And they make an assumption that everyone is using these things periodically, which is not a good assumption to make in DSRC; some of our applications transmit periodically, but some do not.
If you and I do that at the same time, there will be another packet collision.
Once they make that decision, they use it again and again. I think on average 50 times.
| Traffic21 | Page 17
There are three or four other problems like that, that have been brought up by companies like Autotalks and NXP that are in the silicon business, as concerns. Where does that take us in a technology comparison? What is the net of all that? Out of all the different dimensions, the technical or performance dimension is probably not the determinative one.
We have to think about cost, and evolution, and readiness for deployment. They make arguments about being able to evolve that ignore the reality of evolution in an ad hoc network.
I would argue that In the LTE world we have user equipment and base stations and most of the intelligence lives in the base station. It takes care of a lot of that management stuff and the user equipment can be simple and cheap.
That means the intelligence from the base station has to be pushed out. On the other hand, when we wrote the We took functions out. We took that out; there are no access points in DSRC. Why do you think they are so committed to C-V2X. In the DSRC world, we made an effort to avoid patenting our ideas and we were pretty successful with that.
That probably will be Those newer cars will be able to interact with the whole population of That evolution makes more sense to me than evolving from an It implies that some people are going to send BSMs on channel x using technology a, and others are going to send them on channel y using technology b. Is there any reason that C-V2X has to operate in the 5. The thing is, the 5. No operator wants that.