# Einstein energy mass relationship and chemical equations

### E=mc2 and binding energy. From Einstein Light

The Three Meanings Of E=mc^2, Einstein's Most Famous Equation This rocket is powered by Mass/Energy conversion, and E=mc^2. including mechanical energy, chemical energy, electrical energy, as well as kinetic energy. The full and general relationship, then, for any moving object, isn't just E. Alok Jha: Albert Einstein's famous equation E=mc2 for the first time The relationship between energy and mass came out of another of. E = mc2: E = mc^2, equation in Einstein's theory of special relativity that The mass-energy relation, moreover, implies that, if energy is released from the body as a chemical reactions, but much larger conversions occur in nuclear reactions.

In this case, the E in the formula is the energy released and removed, and the mass m is how much the mass decreases. In the same way, when any sort of energy is added to an isolated system, the increase in the mass is equal to the added energy divided by c2. An object moves with different speed in different frames, depending on the motion of the observer, so the kinetic energy in both Newtonian mechanics and relativity is frame dependent.

This means that the amount of relativistic energy, and therefore the amount of relativistic mass, that an object is measured to have depends on the observer. The rest mass is defined as the mass that an object has when it is not moving or when an inertial frame is chosen such that it is not moving. The term also applies to the invariant mass of systems when the system as a whole is not "moving" has no net momentum.

The rest and invariant masses are the smallest possible value of the mass of the object or system. They also are conserved quantities, so long as the system is isolated. Because of the way they are calculated, the effects of moving observers are subtracted, so these quantities do not change with the motion of the observer.

The rest mass is almost never additive: The rest mass of an object is the total energy of all the parts, including kinetic energy, as measured by an observer that sees the center of the mass of the object to be standing still.

The rest mass adds up only if the parts are standing still and do not attract or repel, so that they do not have any extra kinetic or potential energy.

## E=mc2: Einstein's equation that gave birth to the atom bomb

The other possibility is that they have a positive kinetic energy and a negative potential energy that exactly cancels. Binding energy and the "mass defect"[ edit ] This section needs additional citations for verification.

July Learn how and when to remove this template message Whenever any type of energy is removed from a system, the mass associated with the energy is also removed, and the system therefore loses mass. However, use of this formula in such circumstances has led to the false idea that mass has been "converted" to energy.

This may be particularly the case when the energy and mass removed from the system is associated with the binding energy of the system. In such cases, the binding energy is observed as a "mass defect" or deficit in the new system.

The fact that the released energy is not easily weighed in many such cases, may cause its mass to be neglected as though it no longer existed. This circumstance has encouraged the false idea of conversion of mass to energy, rather than the correct idea that the binding energy of such systems is relatively large, and exhibits a measurable mass, which is removed when the binding energy is removed.

The difference between the rest mass of a bound system and of the unbound parts is the binding energy of the system, if this energy has been removed after binding. For example, a water molecule weighs a little less than two free hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom. The minuscule mass difference is the energy needed to split the molecule into three individual atoms divided by c2which was given off as heat when the molecule formed this heat had mass. Likewise, a stick of dynamite in theory weighs a little bit more than the fragments after the explosion, but this is true only so long as the fragments are cooled and the heat removed.

Such a change in mass may only happen when the system is open, and the energy and mass escapes. Thus, if a stick of dynamite is blown up in a hermetically sealed chamber, the mass of the chamber and fragments, the heat, sound, and light would still be equal to the original mass of the chamber and dynamite. If sitting on a scale, the weight and mass would not change. This would in theory also happen even with a nuclear bomb, if it could be kept in an ideal box of infinite strength, which did not rupture or pass radiation.

If then, however, a transparent window passing only electromagnetic radiation were opened in such an ideal box after the explosion, and a beam of X-rays and other lower-energy light allowed to escape the box, it would eventually be found to weigh one gram less than it had before the explosion.

This weight loss and mass loss would happen as the box was cooled by this process, to room temperature. However, any surrounding mass that absorbed the X-rays and other "heat" would gain this gram of mass from the resulting heating, so the mass "loss" would represent merely its relocation.

Thus, no mass or, in the case of a nuclear bomb, no matter would be "converted" to energy in such a process.

### E=mc^2 - An Explanation of the Basics and Units

Mass and energy, as always, would both be separately conserved. Consequently, the mass defect is large: While we're considering gold, it's worth noting that the reason why its colour is different from that of most metals is due to relativistic effects on inner electrons: Studies of highly charged ions are regularly performed because the optical transitions between electron states in these ions can be measured very precisely to produce extremely precise time measurements and to test fundamental theories of physics.

Positronium an 'atom' formed from an electron and a positron might seem to be another candidate for measuring a purely electric or chemical binding energy.

However, it is not stable enough to allow the precision needed a few parts per million. Why would they apply relativity in this calculation of a chemical mass defect? Chemistry, at its fundamental level, is quantum mechanics and electricity, and relativistic quantum electrodynamics is by far the most precise and exact theory in all of science — for some measurements, its precision is better than one part in a trillion. Like measuring the distance to the moon with mm precision.

In principle, a measurement of a reaction, chemical or other, that had a binding energy but no mass defect would disprove relativity. However, relativity works just as well for electric forces as it does for nuclear forces. The coal was burned under a water-filled boiler to produce steam, which in turn pushed pistons attached to the wheels of the train, the wheels turned and the train was set in motion.

In this example we start with locked up "latent" chemical energy in the coal. The chemical energy is turned into heat energy sometimes called "thermal energy" by burning the coal and boiling the water. Finally, the thermal energy is turned into the energy of movement "kinetic energy" by forcing the steam into pistons to drive the wheels: However, as different as all these types of energy seem they can all be measured in the same way and thought of as the same thing. The unit that we use to measure energy, from whatever energy source, is the joule J.

Two ways in which we use this unit in everyday terms are: The total amount of energy in a system: As noted above, one example is a lump of coal, which when burned will release a certain number of joules J of energy, mostly in the forms of heat and light. Another, perhaps more common example, is that it takes about 1 joule to raise an apple by 1 metre.

Energy used up over time: Most electrical devices have their power consumption rated in watts W. A watt is a rate of energy consumption of one joule per second. So, if you have a light bulb in your room that's rated at W it's using energy at a rate of joules every second.

To go back to the second example in the first bullet point, lifting an apple by 1 metre every second would mean that there is a power output of 1 watt.

For most people this would be quite easy and could be kept up for quite a long time, but now imagine lifting apples a second, i. This, in human terms, is a large power output, but nothing special for many electrical devices. It's not uncommon, for example, for a kettle to be rated at W or more. That's a lot of apples! So, to summarise, energy comes in many forms, and it can be transferred from one system to another.

The basic unit of measurement for energy is the joule.

Another and simpler way of defining mass is to say that it's the total amount of matter in an object. As with energy, the idea that mass is common to all objects is relatively new and again dates back to around the nineteenth century.

Before that time different solids, liquids and gases were all thought to be only loosely connected in conceptual terms.

### Mass–energy equivalence - Wikipedia

As with energy, we now consider that mass is neither created or destroyed, but is merely changed from one form to another, e. We use the letter c to represent the speed of light.

Up until that time everyone assumed that the speed of light was infinite, i.